What constitutes a “good–for–business” policy for the city?Councillors who voted for and against the big box developmentat Fifty Road and the QEW both justified their positions as pro–business.Maria Pearson, Lloyd Ferguson and Dave Mitchell were amongthose who supported the Wal–Mart centred development and itspromise of jobs and taxes.“There’s actually nothing wrong with the application,” statedPearson. “We need jobs. We need building. We need business.”She argued that Hamilton is “losing business to othercommunities”, and that hopes of attracting higher payingindustrial jobs to such lands are unfounded.“If we think that we’re going to get huge paying jobs cominginto this community, and industry like we saw in the ‘40s and ‘50sand ‘60s with the Stelcos and Dofascos of 20,000 and up people, Idon’t think we’re going to see that again in our lifetime.”Ferguson agreed, noting that there are “no applicationscoming in” for industrial development and that the developer“wouldn’t make that kind of investment unless they think there’sa market there.” He also was enthusiastic about the revenues thatstaff expect will flow to the city from construction of thecommercial complex.
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend
Reader Comments